Technorama

An omnibus of tech posts by a Futurologist on software development primarily.

Saturday, 24 November 2007

 

Google Analytics "urchin" cookie tracking

While testing my site earlier I noticed cookies called __utma, __utmb, __utmc and __utmz being set from jguk.org, what was worse was that they lasted until 23 Nov 2007, and had unique numbers in them, like 98208771.

I've found out that they orginated not from my site, but from "http://www.google-analytics.com/urchin.js". This was a free google service I signed up to but couldn't get anything useful out of it as it was using proprietary Adobe Flash files for its display. I already have an http://extremetracking.com/ button visible and a hit counter, so I've fallen back to using that. (These services aren't perfect though, e.g. they record screen size not current browser window size!)

I've removed the code that was setting these unreasonable cookies (practice what I preach eh?), and I suggest you all clear out your cookies from my domain, and consider if you want to clear out these __utm* cookies from other domains too. Another way of achieving the same result is to use the Customise Google extension to Firefox!

Urchin can track every single click on a webpage if the developer sets it up like that, they just add something to the onclick param of the anchor tag like this:

onClick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/directory/file.html");"

It could even be used to see what links people hovered over with by adding the function call to the onMouseOver param.

It's intrusive use of features like this which ruin it for the rest of us who love webpages which are javascript enabled (AJAX etc!). This is going to make people want to selectively block Javascript for certain sites, and then those sites may not function well enough.

Other sites have the same problem, take Ian Brown's Blogzilla as but one example, should anyone really be using Google urchin tracking!?

Labels: ,


Comments: Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]





<< Home

Archives

February 2003   March 2003   April 2003   August 2004   September 2004   December 2004   May 2005   June 2005   December 2006   January 2007   February 2007   March 2007   April 2007   July 2007   August 2007   September 2007   October 2007   November 2007   December 2007   January 2008   February 2008   March 2008   April 2008   May 2008   June 2008   July 2008   August 2008   September 2008   October 2008   November 2008   December 2008   January 2009   February 2009   March 2009   April 2009   September 2009   November 2009   December 2009   January 2010   April 2010   September 2010   October 2010   November 2010   December 2010   January 2011   February 2011   March 2011   April 2011   May 2011   June 2011   July 2011   August 2011   September 2011   October 2011   November 2011   December 2011   January 2012   February 2012   March 2012   April 2012   May 2012   June 2012   July 2012   October 2012   December 2012   March 2013   May 2013   August 2013   September 2013   October 2013   November 2013   March 2014   May 2014   June 2014   July 2014   September 2014   October 2014   December 2014   January 2015   February 2015   March 2015   April 2015   May 2015   June 2015   July 2015   August 2015   September 2015   October 2015   November 2015   December 2015   March 2016   April 2016   May 2016   July 2016   August 2016   September 2016   October 2016   November 2016   December 2016   January 2017   February 2017   March 2017   April 2017   May 2017   June 2017   July 2017   August 2017   September 2017   November 2017   March 2018   April 2018   May 2018   June 2018   August 2018   October 2018   December 2018   January 2019   March 2019   May 2019   August 2019   September 2019   March 2020   April 2020   May 2020   September 2020   October 2020   February 2022   June 2022   July 2022   October 2022   December 2022   February 2023   April 2023   September 2023   October 2023   May 2024   June 2024   July 2024  

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Subscribe to Posts [Atom]