Technorama

An omnibus of tech posts by a Futurologist on software development primarily.

Friday, 2 January 2009

 

Redhat ditch RPM for DEB apt-get in 2009?

One of the common problems installing software on GNU-Linux machines is the variety of different packaging systems. Redhat is still persevering with its own RPM packing system, when others have already adopted the standard DEB package format.. how long till they make the switch to DEB and apt-get online repositories?

RPM is notorious for dependency problems, I've suffered with Mandriva and Fedora in the past when trying to get extra software packages working. It's now time for consolidation Redhat! They're losing out to Ubuntu.. so this might even tempt some users back ;)

Dropping RPM would save Redhat development costs, and make it easier for customers to move to Redhat from all the DEB based distributions of GNU-Linux (Ubuntu etc). SuSE should also migrate their YUM front end to DEB!

Labels: , , ,


Comments:
I have seen several people "in the know" claim that RPM tools are more advanced that DPKG tools for newer versions of RPM. I would normally discount this as fanboyism, but the two developers worked on Ubuntu.
 
Daengbo: Thanks for your comment.

I'd like to see the developers of RPM and DEB work together to find a common way forward, if DEB is behind, definitely it should incorporate features Redhat would need.

There are many duplications in GNU-Linux distros, DEB vs RPM is just one. If GNU-Linux is ever going to dominate on the desktop it needs to standardise and give users a similar experience on different distros they try out!
 
Don't blame RPM for dependency problems, blame the developers of the .rpm files.

.deb files also suffer dependency problems, but I don't see you complaining about it. How come?
 
Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]





<< Home

Archives

February 2003   March 2003   April 2003   August 2004   September 2004   December 2004   May 2005   June 2005   December 2006   January 2007   February 2007   March 2007   April 2007   July 2007   August 2007   September 2007   October 2007   November 2007   December 2007   January 2008   February 2008   March 2008   April 2008   May 2008   June 2008   July 2008   August 2008   September 2008   October 2008   November 2008   December 2008   January 2009   February 2009   March 2009   April 2009   September 2009   November 2009   December 2009   January 2010   April 2010   September 2010   October 2010   November 2010   December 2010   January 2011   February 2011   March 2011   April 2011   May 2011   June 2011   July 2011   August 2011   September 2011   October 2011   November 2011   December 2011   January 2012   February 2012   March 2012   April 2012   May 2012   June 2012   July 2012   October 2012   December 2012   March 2013   May 2013   August 2013   September 2013   October 2013   November 2013   March 2014   May 2014   June 2014   July 2014   September 2014   October 2014   December 2014   January 2015   February 2015   March 2015   April 2015   May 2015   June 2015   July 2015   August 2015   September 2015   October 2015   November 2015   December 2015   March 2016   April 2016   May 2016   July 2016   August 2016   September 2016   October 2016   November 2016   December 2016   January 2017   February 2017   March 2017   April 2017   May 2017   June 2017   July 2017   August 2017   September 2017   November 2017   March 2018   April 2018   May 2018   June 2018   August 2018   October 2018   December 2018   January 2019   March 2019   May 2019   August 2019   September 2019   March 2020   April 2020   May 2020   September 2020   October 2020   February 2022   June 2022   July 2022   October 2022   December 2022   February 2023   April 2023   September 2023   October 2023   May 2024   June 2024   July 2024  

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Subscribe to Posts [Atom]