Technorama
An omnibus of tech posts by a Futurologist on
software development primarily.
Tuesday, 8 November 2011
The scurge of noreply emails
Don't you just find it frustrating when an organisation you are buying a service from like graze.com sends you an email with a "noreply" from address? Any reply by me querying my order will result in a bounce. It's pretty unprofessional.
Luckily no company dares to do it with their postal address. Imagine getting your order letter:
From:
Online Books
No Street
No town
No county
NO1 4BG
So why do firms get away with these noreply bulk emails? Email is a two way communication, that's why I have a valid from address on email I send to companies I am trading with.
As part of email 2.0, invalid email addresses should be rejected by SMTP servers, preventing companies sending these emails to people.
Labels: email
Tuesday, 13 September 2011
Email 2.0 - We all need PGP email, for certainty and to prevent spam
It's been decades since PGP was invented, but we still all send email in the clear.
For everyone to benefit from encrypted/signed email, it has to be easy. Even as easy as the keys resiging on the GMail or Yahoo!Mail server. The lack of ease, is the only thing preventing addoption.
I'd like to email my accountant, and colleagues confidential documents, but I can't because the email would be un-encrypted.
Likewise, the person emailing me would be able to sign their email with a PGP signature. If that signature was invalid, I would know it was fraudulent.
PGP would assist with anti-spam systems, because I don't have to accept email from someone with a 0 PGP rating of their email address, the same way I don't have to buy from an eBay user with (0) feedbacks ;)
Labels: email, Spam
Sunday, 9 January 2011
jon@facebookmail.com
How long till I can register jon@facebookmail.com !? FB has already registered and set up facebookmail.com.. so it must be coming soon ;-)
Labels: email, facebook
Thursday, 28 January 2010
Time to pay for email?
Guardian has an interesting article
The end of free email.
Like calling an organisation or person, I have to pay the cost of the
phone call! Likewise for sending them a letter (with the exception of
organisations offering FREEPOST addresses). Perhaps we should do the
same for email, 1p per email externally to start with?
"One of the best ways to deal with externalities is to create a market. This means we start respecting other people's inbox as their own property, and stop dumping into it without consideration. We create a system that forces people to bear more of the costs of their actions."Interesting to consider the options to try cut back on both unnecessary email and spam email. Having authenticated SMTP servers on a white list would make it much eaier to see who was actually emailing too.
Labels: email, Spam, UK
Wednesday, 6 January 2010
Web unified HOME folder and email
Back in 2005 I had a great idea, only found time this evening to write about it due to the snow in UK :)
Essentially we have two folder hierarchies, HOME folder, and email Inbox etc when we only need one!
So currently I have in my HOME folder I have:
DocumentsMusicVideosPhotosPublicDeletedTosortIn my Email I have:
InboxDraftsSentDeletedDocumentsTake the example of me quoting for some work. On a spreadsheet I calculate my costs, my fees and I email my total quote to client as my tender. Now in a conventional system I could not store that spreadsheet with the email. I need to keep two different directory structures.
So I'd like my email client to operate on the HOME folder, I even have "Tosort" which is basically an "Inbox" and of cause Deleted.
So this means we have:
Inbox
Drafts
Sent
Documents
Photos
Videos
Public
Deleted
This allows more flexibility, I can even save a document and photo in the same folder which contains my email about the same topic for future reference.
For true flexibility this unified HOME directory would be hosted on a server, so I can access from any of my netbooks, and weblogins.
Labels: email, Future
Monday, 28 September 2009
Easy email unsend cancel design ;)
Pretty easy to unsend an email when it's not actually been sent yet.. mail client just needs to implement a 2min delay, giving you plenty of time to go into your Sent folder and click Cancel on it!
Labels: email
Monday, 13 October 2008
Why web forms are bad (compared to email)
Don't you just hate it when you click on the "
email" link on someone's website and it takes you to a tiny web-form which only fits about 6 words per line, cramped into a small box? After struggling to write your message you invariably click "submit" and it says Error.. you click the "back" button optimistically and of cause the whole message is gone. Webmasters got overexcited and tried to run internet messaging through a web page, when really it should be left as standard email or IM.
Short run down of why web-forms are bad for messages:
- Tiny form boxes, pledgebank is a great example, limited to 7 words per line.
- Often arbitrary restrictions on the text that can be written. Lincolnshire NHS trust have a secret blocked character list including ",', and ; then they limit to 255 characters.
- Often fails to "Submit" and when you click back of cause it has lost all your text.
- Leaves me with no record in my Sent folder of what I've written.
- No way to forward the message I have sent to a friend, or another department at the organisation.
All these problems make it very difficult to send a website a message telling them one of their pages has broken links or typos etc. Web-forms can always be a secondary contact option, but email should always be the first option as it is the best. See
Email 101 for tips on writing to the point.
Labels: email, Future, Web
Saturday, 29 December 2007
Fix outlook to *not* top-post!
Came across this
Microsoft page with the following tip to get rid of those annoying quoted copies of emails which get included when replying:
"Do not automatically include the original message
- In the main Office Outlook 2007 window, on the Tools menu, click Options.
- Click the Preferences tab, and then click E-Mail Options.
- Under On replies and forwards, in the When replying to a message drop-down list, select Do not include original message."
Labels: email
Wednesday, 14 November 2007
Incorrect email from, envelope-sender and reply-to addresses
Companies seem to be getting worse at email these days. Now email is almost considered a shot in the dark, with either an invalid from, return-path and sender address, or one which which send any reply straight to /dev/null. And now some even bounce back saying there will be no response to emails and we should call a premium rate call centre number.
Take the example of this marketing email I got from Holiday Extras. The return address was agent@ukex11.pur3.net and the from address was
. Reply to the email and you get a bounce straight back. They should have set them to customerrelations@holidayextras.com!
Some companies now insist on filing any "email" contact with them in a tiny web-form, which I don't think really is fair to really call email. This means we don't have a copy of the "email" in our "Sent" folder with the rest of our email, and we have no record that we have contacted the company though the tiny web-form, so when they don't reply we don't have a copy of what we sent them or any proof.
Often the web-forms will have bugs, like a 255 character limit, or a silly set of blocked characters which includes question marks and commas.
Got another one today saying "NOTE: This is an automatically generated email. Please do not reply to this email."... but when I email these companies I don't hide my email address.. The same when they
call me from Withheld numbers..
So, any companies reading this.. switch back to standard email, and provide good customer service!
Labels: email
Saturday, 28 July 2007
Why email is better than forums
I'll start by defining my terms, a Conversation is communication between two or more people over an standard network protocol. Typical conversation protocols are email (SMTP) and Instant Message (Jabber).
The crux of this post is that unfortunately there has been a wave of replacing these established Conversation protocols with a "Forum". Where a forum is a web-based conversation system which does not interact with existing Conversation software like Outlook or Thunderbird etc.
Forums use a custom format per implementation, and store their Conversation records in a centralised location in a custom format incompatible with other Conversation systems or even other Forums. This change has been a shame, because we have lost the flexibility we had. And don't forget, people can browse email conversations online in a web-browser in just the same way that a Forum can be browsed.
One thing that would be handy is if when we join a discussion mailing list, we could also search the archive of the mailing list direct from our conversation software.
In the meantime, I'm going to save my time, and stick to email mailing lists
Labels: email
Archives
February 2003
March 2003
April 2003
August 2004
September 2004
December 2004
May 2005
June 2005
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007
July 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007
November 2007
December 2007
January 2008
February 2008
March 2008
April 2008
May 2008
June 2008
July 2008
August 2008
September 2008
October 2008
November 2008
December 2008
January 2009
February 2009
March 2009
April 2009
September 2009
November 2009
December 2009
January 2010
April 2010
September 2010
October 2010
November 2010
December 2010
January 2011
February 2011
March 2011
April 2011
May 2011
June 2011
July 2011
August 2011
September 2011
October 2011
November 2011
December 2011
January 2012
February 2012
March 2012
April 2012
May 2012
June 2012
July 2012
October 2012
December 2012
March 2013
May 2013
August 2013
September 2013
October 2013
November 2013
March 2014
May 2014
June 2014
July 2014
September 2014
October 2014
December 2014
January 2015
February 2015
March 2015
April 2015
May 2015
June 2015
July 2015
August 2015
September 2015
October 2015
November 2015
December 2015
March 2016
April 2016
May 2016
July 2016
August 2016
September 2016
October 2016
November 2016
December 2016
January 2017
February 2017
March 2017
April 2017
May 2017
June 2017
July 2017
August 2017
September 2017
November 2017
March 2018
April 2018
May 2018
June 2018
August 2018
October 2018
December 2018
January 2019
March 2019
May 2019
August 2019
September 2019
March 2020
April 2020
May 2020
September 2020
October 2020
February 2022
June 2022
July 2022
October 2022
December 2022
February 2023
April 2023
September 2023
October 2023
May 2024
June 2024
July 2024
July 2025

Subscribe to Posts [Atom]